[PATCH STABLE] test-bookmarks: factor hooks out to a shell script for Windows

Augie Fackler raf at durin42.com
Thu Apr 27 20:55:53 EDT 2017


> On Apr 27, 2017, at 20:55, Sean Farley <sean at farley.io> wrote:
> 
> Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:47:14 -0400, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:34:00PM -0400, Matt Harbison wrote:
>>>> # HG changeset patch
>>>> # User Matt Harbison <matt_harbison at yahoo.com>
>>>> # Date 1493172626 14400
>>>> #      Tue Apr 25 22:10:26 2017 -0400
>>>> # Branch stable
>>>> # Node ID 493b1e7c6299055e7240e704548677797de35be7
>>>> # Parent  dc1d4df47b5ba0f908f91cf6a4b7e7cf73f40884
>>>> test-bookmarks: factor hooks out to a shell script for Windows
>>> 
>>> Queued, thanks. How are tests on windows doing these days? Using msys,
>>> or something else?
>> 
>> Tantalizingly close to green, and that's with a local hghaveaddon.py that  
>> enables #serve on Windows.  Only 81 tests are skipped.
>> 
>> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2017-April/096987.html
>> 
>> Of that list, the bookmarks-pushpull.t test is fixed here.  http-proxy.t  
>> is the one nobody has chimed in on yet, but I can't imagine that it's  
>> critical.  hghave.t and logtoprocess.t are not important.
>> 
>> I'm on Windows 7, with MinGW that I installed ~5 years ago.  I'm hesitant  
>> to upgrade, because it works.  Kostia told me offline that he thinks  
>> there's ~90 tests failing, but he's on Windows 10, and doing some custom  
>> build stuff.
> 
> What are the chances of being able to use WSL for running tests?

Not great. WSL has some of the same weirdness as cygwin, and you really want to stay either all-WSL or all-Windows, and avoid crossing the streams.


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list