[PATCH 3 of 3] run-tests: accept '\' vs '/' path differences without '(glob)'
mharbison72 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 11 00:24:29 EST 2017
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 18:28:03 -0500, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 10, 2017, at 5:39 PM, Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com>
>> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:48:26 -0500, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com>
>>>> On Dec 10, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com>
>>>> # HG changeset patch
>>>> # User Matt Harbison <matt_harbison at yahoo.com>
>>>> # Date 1512882971 18000
>>>> # Sun Dec 10 00:16:11 2017 -0500
>>>> # Node ID ebc7a05d9389989fc2e81d30fa1c10dd01be9a76
>>>> # Parent e1119050f15e2169ac766e6a69eeab70729e9e40
>>>> run-tests: accept '\' vs '/' path differences without '(glob)’
>>> series queued, many thanks
>>>> It's probably unreasonable to submit a single patch that wipes out
>>>> all of the
>>>> (glob) instances that were only used to hide path differences, given
>>>> the churn
>>>> from other contributors. Since their presence isn't harming the
>>>> tests, these
>>>> can be removed through attrition.
>>> You could do it if you wanted with a skip-blame annotation as was done
>>> in d92dc725223b. Then we can pass the right filter to `hg annotate`
>>> and not see the noop changes. Not a requirement though, don’t feel
>>> obligated to do so.
OK, done. But 3 of 3 isn't showing up in the mail archive, and at ~290K
for that patch, I would have expected a digest email too. So something
choked. I'll try to check tomorrow around 8:30 EST and resend if needed,
before too much more activity occurs.
Random thought: should these # skip-blame markers also imply a default
skip in bisect? It's probably too late to change the name now...
More information about the Mercurial-devel