D1753: streamclone: preserve remote phases (issue5648)

[indygreg (Gregory Szorc)]

indygreg added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> yuja wrote in streamclone.py:191
> Shouldn't we test `remotephases.get('publishing', False)` for
> mixed-phase + publishing server?

Maybe.

My reasoning here was that if the remote advertises phases data, then it is phases aware and the code below will ensure phases are adjusted appropriately. We certainly could special case the mixed phase + publishing case and skip all phase adjustment.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1753

To: indygreg, #hg-reviewers, yuja
Cc: yuja, mercurial-devel