D1753: streamclone: preserve remote phases (issue5648)
yuja (Yuya Nishihara)
phabricator at mercurial-scm.org
Thu Dec 28 08:14:39 EST 2017
yuja added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> indygreg wrote in streamclone.py:191
> Maybe.
>
> My reasoning here was that if the remote advertises phases data, then it is phases aware and the code below will ensure phases are adjusted appropriately. We certainly could special case the mixed phase + publishing case and skip all phase adjustment.
Perhaps the remote sends back actual phases data even if it is a publishing server.
That's probably why `exchange._pullapplyphases()` checks 'publishing' flag.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1753
To: indygreg, #hg-reviewers, yuja
Cc: yuja, mercurial-devel
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list