Next plans on radixlink and hash-preserving obsstore
Jun Wu
quark at fb.com
Mon Jul 10 18:36:50 EDT 2017
Excerpts from Martin von Zweigbergk's message of 2017-07-10 15:28:07 -0700:
> I think you have a good point. We only have exchange directly between
> our clients and our server so far. I don't know if FB users do more
> peer-to-peer exchanges. It's very easy to forget that we also need to
> handle those cases well.
The discussion seems to suggest that hash-preserving and exchange conflict
with each other, or exchange code has to be rewritten from scratch with
hash-preserving. That's untrue. Hash-preserving won't break exchange and the
existing algorithm in core could largely be reused. Of course, clients need
upgrade to understand the new format.
Besides, I believe the new format has some nice parts to make it easier to
optimize the exchange algorithm. I'll get into tech details when we start
format discussion formally.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list