Potential BC changes to sparse before freeze

[Siddharth Agarwal]

On 7/11/17 1:17 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-devel wrote:
> I think I'm against this. I think it's clearer that excludes trump
> includes if they appear after. Of course,*I*  can continue to write it
> that way and we can let anyone choose their own order, so it won't
> really make a difference to me. What's the reason you want to be able
> to put excludes before includes?

Yeah, I agree. This seems like a great way to make reading sparse 
profiles clearer.