Experimenting with Phabricator for reviews

[Augie Fackler]

> On Jul 14, 2017, at 7:30 PM, Sean Farley <sean at farley.io> wrote:
> 
> 
> Jun Wu <quark at fb.com> writes:
> 
>> Excerpts from Sean Farley's message of 2017-07-14 16:26:34 -0700:
>>> Huh? But that's the thing, isn't it? Previously, comments about code
>>> review are on the list. One can peruse them at leisure or archive /
>>> skip, etc. What you're saying, if I'm not mistaken, is that some
>>> comments (no matter the content) will no longer be on the list. That
>>> makes perusing them now split into two locations.
>> 
>> I think what I suggested is to move those emails to another list. So if
>> people want to read them in an email client, they will still be able to.
> 
> Ah, yes, I was confused about your /dev/null comment. I see now; sorry
> for the confusion.
> 
> Though, I'm not thrilled about the idea of another list but that's
> another discussion.

I’m extremely resistant to the idea that we should move the phabricator emails - I’d rather we figure out how to get them to behave so that we don’t fracture our review community.