[PATCH 1 of 3 STABLE V2] pager: rename 'pager.enable' to 'ui.pager'

[Pierre-Yves David]

On 05/02/2017 04:34 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2017 21:22:02 -0400, Augie Fackler wrote:
>> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 10:29:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org>
>>> # Date 1493649410 -7200
>>> #      Mon May 01 16:36:50 2017 +0200
>>> # Branch stable
>>> # Node ID 853bf9ca7b3b1f4d8f54ed8c60ff92371132c097
>>> # Parent  ad70a36b5b472c295bfdb849ba69eac871305b36
>>> # EXP-Topic pager
>>> # Available At https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/users/marmoute/mercurial/
>>> #              hg pull https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/users/marmoute/mercurial/ -r 853bf9ca7b3b
>>> pager: rename 'pager.enable' to 'ui.pager'
>>
>> Mentioned this on the other thread, but in brief here so it doesn't
>> get overlooked: I think ui.pager is confusing as a boolean when
>> ui.editor already exists and is a program to invoke. They sound
>> related to me.
>
> Agreed. pager.enable is a bit unfortunate, but 'ui.pager = <bool>' is more
> confusing.

Given that gathering main interface knob in `[ui]`, maybe we can find 
something else that fit both constraint (in [ui]; not confusing with 
ui.editor).

I can think about `ui.use-pager` and `ui.paginate`.

What do you think ?

(On related new, `pager.enable=<bool>` seems a bit off with 
`pager.ignore=<list>`. Especially since we need a counter-part to 
`pager.ignore=<list>` that could be `pager.enable=<list>`)

-- 
Pierre-Yves David