[PATCH] outgoing: run on filtered repo

[Martin von Zweigbergk]

# HG changeset patch
# User Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz at google.com>
# Date 1494004116 25200
#      Fri May 05 10:08:36 2017 -0700
# Node ID 992b37360cb54124e8718f70cfccc1ee3a3f8d44
# Parent  2cfdf5241096f6c0c2d45d32b2f1a41575835025
outgoing: run on filtered repo

outgoing has been using a filtered repo since fe67107094fd (discovery:
outgoing pass unfiltered repo to findcommonincoming (issue3776),
2013-01-28). If I'm reading code and history correctly, it should be
safe to run _outgoing() on a filtered repo since c5456b64eb07
(discovery: run discovery on filtered repository, 2015-01-07). By
running _outgoing() on a filtered repo, we can also remove the
workaround there for ignoring filtered revisions.

diff --git a/mercurial/hg.py b/mercurial/hg.py
--- a/mercurial/hg.py
+++ b/mercurial/hg.py
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@
         revs = [repo.lookup(rev) for rev in scmutil.revrange(repo, revs)]
 
     other = peer(repo, opts, dest)
-    outgoing = discovery.findcommonoutgoing(repo.unfiltered(), other, revs,
+    outgoing = discovery.findcommonoutgoing(repo, other, revs,
                                             force=opts.get('force'))
     o = outgoing.missing
     if not o:
diff --git a/mercurial/scmutil.py b/mercurial/scmutil.py
--- a/mercurial/scmutil.py
+++ b/mercurial/scmutil.py
@@ -120,10 +120,6 @@
     secretlist = []
     if excluded:
         for n in excluded:
-            if n not in repo:
-                # discovery should not have included the filtered revision,
-                # we have to explicitly exclude it until discovery is cleanup.
-                continue
             ctx = repo[n]
             if ctx.phase() >= phases.secret and not ctx.extinct():
                 secretlist.append(n)