[PATCH 1 of 2] sslutil: tweak the legacy [hostfingerprints] warning message

[Matt Harbison]

On Thu, 11 May 2017 03:02:42 -0400, Gregory Szorc  
<gregory.szorc at gmail.com> wrote:

> # HG changeset patch
> # User Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc at gmail.com>
> # Date 1494485377 25200
> #      Wed May 10 23:49:37 2017 -0700
> # Node ID fc01a88a85d64a3a440971c5e3b6c8f7db030170
> # Parent  1ada3d18e7fbc9069910f2c036992d2f2b28e058
> sslutil: tweak the legacy [hostfingerprints] warning message
>
> Lars Rohwedder noted in issue5559 that the previous wording was
> confusing. I agree.
>
> diff --git a/mercurial/sslutil.py b/mercurial/sslutil.py
> --- a/mercurial/sslutil.py
> +++ b/mercurial/sslutil.py
> @@ -820,13 +820,11 @@ def validatesocket(sock):
>                  if settings['legacyfingerprint']:
>                      ui.warn(_('(SHA-1 fingerprint for %s found in  
> legacy '
>                                '[hostfingerprints] section; '
> -                              'if you trust this fingerprint, set the '
> -                              'following config value in [hostsecurity]  
> and '
> -                              'remove the old one from  
> [hostfingerprints] '
> -                              'to upgrade to a more secure SHA-256 '
> -                              'fingerprint: '
> -                              '%s.fingerprints=%s)\n') % (
> -                                  host, host, nicefingerprint))
> +                              'if you trust this fingerprint, remove  
> the old '
> +                              'SHA-1 fingerprint from  
> [hostfingerprints] and '
> +                              'add the following entry to the new '
> +                              '[hostsecurity] section:  
> %s.fingerprints=%s)\n') %
> +                            (host, host, nicefingerprint))
>                  return
>         # Pinned fingerprint didn't match. This is a fatal error.

I'm guessing it's because stable hasn't been merged since 5559, but  
s/%s.fingerprints/%s:fingerprints/ ?