[PATCH 05 of 11] templatekw: introduce obsfate keyword

[Pulkit Goyal]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net> wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net>
> # Date 1507218176 -7200
> #      Thu Oct 05 17:42:56 2017 +0200
> # Node ID c60eccc28286bdb8f962b75b7dab0fa87c6abb7d
> # Parent  5657c12f1f9ef4190f390a50194d5e614e67b8c8
> # EXP-Topic obsfatekeyword
> # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/
> #              hg pull https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ -r c60eccc28286
> templatekw: introduce obsfate keyword
>
> Introduce an obsfate printer that uses all helpers functions defined in
> obsutil to get all the obsfate-related data and format a string according to
> the current format in test-obsmarker-template.t.
>
> Then, introduce an obsfate templatekw that uses the obsfateprinter to return a
> list of strings.
>
> The goal is not to replace existing obsfate template functions but to propose
> a default, good-enough and easily usable obsfate definition for end-users that
> don't want to customize it. Such output would ultimately get included in the
> default log output.
>
> Here are some output examples for a commit amended by current user and test2:
>
> rewritten using amend as 3:d004c8f274b9 by test2

This example seems wrong to me. The current user and test2 both
amended the commit, but it tells about the amend by test2 user only.
Is it intended?