[survey] How do you feel about Phabricator? Please take a survey!

Augie Fackler raf at durin42.com
Thu Sep 7 15:25:40 EDT 2017


If you don't care about how code contribution and review happens for Mercurial, you can stop reading now.

As you've probably noticed, we're experimenting with using Phabricator for contributing and reviewing patches. We're at a point now where we'd love to hear more broadly how people feel about Phabricator. We know it's been a rough experiment, but pending the outcome of this (and probably a chat at the sprint), we'll have a better sense of where we should go with review tooling, whether that's more investment on email, Phabricator, or both. Thanks!

https://goo.gl/forms/f6bFnp4bPk04tv4E2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20170907/0d3d802f/attachment.sig>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list