[PATCH 1 of 3 STABLE] context: reimplement memfilectx.cmp()

[Yuya Nishihara]

On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 16:20:12 +0300, Pulkit Goyal wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:27 AM Yuya Nishihara <yuya at tcha.org> wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Yuya Nishihara <yuya at tcha.org>
> > # Date 1544947726 -32400
> > #      Sun Dec 16 17:08:46 2018 +0900
> > # Node ID 79dc95eb84b0f09a39fb396c65ec591f9f0de224
> > # Parent  f1a69099327b6c3d92d2541fe8d40f8fe37a546e
> > context: reimplement memfilectx.cmp()
> >
> > If I added a sanity check to basefilectx, test-context.py exploded. This
> > patch copies the naive implementation from overlayworkingfilectx.
> >
> 
> Did you mean the whole series is for stable or just this patch?

1 for stable, and the others for default (once merged.)

I didn't tried, but memfilectx.cmp() would crash if the other fctx had data
of the same size.

> And how did
> you managed to put the STABLE flag on just one email and not rest? I want
> to learn that trick.

As I'm a templater guru, I just hacked it.

  --config patchbomb.flagtemplate='{ifeq(node|short, "<hash>", "STABLE")}'

Not lovely.