D1756: remotenames: introduce class to encapsulate remotenames info in an extension

Wed Jan 10 23:22:09 UTC 2018

durin42 added a comment.

  In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1756#29970, @pulkit wrote:

  > As per previous discussions, the storage part can only go to core directly (https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1358#22905). I am not sure about how out of core extension and in-core extension will interact. Also shall I change this extension name to prevent conflict with the out of core one?

  My 2Â¢: don't worry about the interactions. The existing remotenames is not published on pypi, so it's very unlikely people have it installed and active as just `remotenames=` in their `extensions` block.

  No idea if others agree though.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1756

To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers
Cc: durin42, mercurial-devel