[PATCH 15 of 25 RFC] phase: enforce internal phase support

Boris FELD lothiraldan at gmail.com
Mon Jul 2 15:49:38 UTC 2018


Hello, coming back from vacation.

I've seen part of the series queued, is there a reason for the two last 
commits to not being queued yet?

Please drop the current RFC series, we will send the new series with a 
higher number for the internal phase after the refactoring series has 
fully landed.

On 25/06/2018 18:44, Augie Fackler wrote:
>
>> On Jun 7, 2018, at 10:11, Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net> wrote:
>>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net>
>> # Date 1527610399 -7200
>> #      Tue May 29 18:13:19 2018 +0200
>> # Node ID ef202521c3c3389198ff917e11dcb7847de3658d
>> # Parent  d6ac390e2ebdf51f095168fe314dd956db09e2b9
>> # EXP-Topic internal-phase
>> # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/
>> #              hg pull https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ -r ef202521c3c3
>> phase: enforce internal phase support
> I'm going to drop this whole series for now, but many thanks for sending it. My comfort level is to make sure the internal phase gets a much higher number, so we've got room in the future for new phases (an "archived" phase has already been discussed, for example).
>
> I've queued a few things from phabricator that make sense, and we'll come back to this series when you're ready. Sound good?
>
> Thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel



More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list