D3764: rebase: improve output of --dry-run
indygreg (Gregory Szorc)
phabricator at mercurial-scm.org
Mon Jun 18 19:03:23 EDT 2018
indygreg added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3764#59425, @pulkit wrote:
> Thinking out loud here: I see that `--dry-run` for rebase will be very useful for automation. How about returning 1 when there are conflicts and returning 0 when there are no conflicts? Also maybe we should add formatter support to the dry-run output for each command so that automation can read the JSON output and tell user what can happen.
I approve of both of these feature suggestions! However, they should be implemented in standalone changesets and not incorporated into this one.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3764
To: khanchi97, #hg-reviewers
Cc: indygreg, pulkit, mercurial-devel
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list