[PATCH V2] outgoing: Support pushrev (issue6106)

Kim Alvefur zash at zash.se
Sat Apr 6 09:22:32 EDT 2019


Hello,

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 07:45:55AM +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> Can you test behavior with -b/--branch or PATH#REV syntax?
> I think commands.push() won't take :pushrev if any revision is specified.

Oh dear, I didn't even know about path#rev. I guess there's also the
`outgoing()` revset that should be considered.

How should -r, -b path#rev and pathrev interact?

> Maybe we can move the pushrev resolution to hg._outgoing().

Sounds senible.

-- 
Kim "Zash" Alvefur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20190406/0cecdcc2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list