[PATCH 2 of 4 V2] verify: introduce a notion of "level"

[Martin von Zweigbergk]

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 6:27 AM Pierre-Yves David <
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 4/17/19 3:18 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019, 03:49 Pierre-Yves David
> > <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org <mailto:pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org>>
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     # HG changeset patch
> >     # User Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at octobus.net
> >     <mailto:pierre-yves.david at octobus.net>>
> >     # Date 1555456341 -7200
> >     #      Wed Apr 17 01:12:21 2019 +0200
> >     # Node ID 55bd98999c25b10e220477fd4cc446a7c9c1f8ca
> >     # Parent  f233cb63bc077267d8571378350d9563cbabcf3d
> >     # EXP-Topic verify
> >     # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/
> >     #              hg pull
> >     https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ -r 55bd98999c25
> >     verify: introduce a notion of "level"
> >
> >
> > I feel like this is unnecessarily complicated. It feels like just
> > passing a boolean "full" would be enough. If one level has been enough
> > for over ten years, it seems likely that two levels will be enough for
> > many years ahead. Or do you plan to add more levels?
>
> I am planning to pass a "quick" mode that only check for stuff like
> revlog size.
>

What about the revlog size would it check?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20190417/442b46f8/attachment.html>