[PATCH] httppeer: make sure we limit argument for older server not supporting batch

[Martin von Zweigbergk]

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:58 AM Pierre-Yves David <
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 4/25/19 6:03 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:25 PM Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc at gmail.com
> > <mailto:gregory.szorc at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:29 AM Pierre-Yves David
> >     <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
> >     <mailto:pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org>> wrote:
> >
> >         # HG changeset patch
> >         # User Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at octobus.net
> >         <mailto:pierre-yves.david at octobus.net>>
> >         # Date 1556049342 -7200
> >         #      Tue Apr 23 21:55:42 2019 +0200
> >         # Node ID 26f277f0f415206036a57f17400284107816f00d
> >         # Parent  84bd6ae2d1f656dff1d494a03558c4edb58ebd31
> >         # EXP-Topic discovery-followup
> >         # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/
> >         #              hg pull
> >         https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ -r 26f277f0f415
> >         httppeer: make sure we limit argument for older server not
> >         supporting batch
> >
> >
> > I believe this patch was in response to a question from me. I was asking
> > if 'httppostargs' automatically upgraded the HTTP method from GET to
> > POST and I thought it did not and that we relied on the use of the
> > 'batch' request for that (which always used POST, I think). Joerg then
> > replied that 'httppostargs' does upgrade from GET to POST, so I think
> > this patch is not needed. Do you (both Greg and Pierre-Yves) agree?
>
> Yes, I agree, it can be dropped, I sent it before I saw Joerg and Martin
> reply.
>

Dropped.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20190425/5a02317d/attachment.html>