D5940: uncommit: add --allowdirtywcopy when possibly hiding data (issue5977)
pulkit (Pulkit Goyal)
phabricator at mercurial-scm.org
Fri Feb 15 14:39:56 EST 2019
pulkit added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> martinvonz wrote in uncommit.py:140
> Doesn't that mean the whole patch is unnecessary? It pretty much just provides an easier way of saying `--config experimental.uncommitondirtywdir=yes`, doesn't it?
Nice point. I had to revisit the bug to understand more now. IMO the bug says as following:
`uncommit` should require a flag or config when it is trying to do the following:
1. uncommit some files which are dirty in wdir, and
2. the files are passed as `hg uncommit PATH`
(refer Yuya's comment: https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5977#c1)
However the bug was filed for evolve uncommit, it's applicable to core one also.
The core uncommit allows you to do `hg uncommit PATH` on a dirty wdir even if `experimental.uncommitondirtywdir` is set. We should change that and let `hg uncommit PATH` work only if `PATH` are not dirty in wdir. If they are dirty, use `experimental.uncommitondirtywdir`.
The end result on a dirty wdir should look like:
`hg uncommit` : abort and require `experimental.uncommitondirtywdir`
`hg uncommit PATH`: works if PATH is clean in wdir, aborts if PATH is dirty and require `experimental.uncommitondirtywdir`
How does that sound?
(Ignore my earlier comments as I didn't figured this out completely then)
(P.S. I hate to say that we have two uncommits which are kind of diverging)
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5940
To: navaneeth.suresh, #hg-reviewers
Cc: martinvonz, pulkit, mercurial-devel
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list