[PATCH 1 of 3 FOLLOW-UP] vfs: fix proxyvfs inheritance

Boris FELD lothiraldan at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 06:19:06 EST 2019


On 03/01/2019 10:03, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 12:29:27 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net>
>> # Date 1546421352 -3600
>> #      Wed Jan 02 10:29:12 2019 +0100
>> # Node ID b33239d75ded3c23d46fe50bb04e0dd3aac9ef9b
>> # Parent  9e593db5f1a1b08f812591439c831ace55bca321
>> # EXP-Topic vfs-audit
>> # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/
>> #              hg pull https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ -r b33239d75ded
>> vfs: fix proxyvfs inheritance
>> -class filtervfs(abstractvfs, proxyvfs):
>> +class filtervfs(proxyvfs, abstractvfs):
> Did you intentionally leave abstractvfs in the list?
No, it's a mistake, I'm not sure what the status of this patch is as
Pulkit said it was queued but I don't see it on the commited repo.
Should I send a V2?
>
>> -class readonlyvfs(abstractvfs, proxyvfs):
>> +class readonlyvfs(proxyvfs):
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list