[PATCH 1 of 3 FOLLOW-UP] vfs: fix proxyvfs inheritance

Pulkit Goyal 7895pulkit at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 09:34:31 EST 2019


On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:50 PM Boris FELD <lothiraldan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 03/01/2019 10:03, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 12:29:27 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
> >> # HG changeset patch
> >> # User Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net>
> >> # Date 1546421352 -3600
> >> #      Wed Jan 02 10:29:12 2019 +0100
> >> # Node ID b33239d75ded3c23d46fe50bb04e0dd3aac9ef9b
> >> # Parent  9e593db5f1a1b08f812591439c831ace55bca321
> >> # EXP-Topic vfs-audit
> >> # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/
> >> #              hg pull https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/
> -r b33239d75ded
> >> vfs: fix proxyvfs inheritance
> >> -class filtervfs(abstractvfs, proxyvfs):
> >> +class filtervfs(proxyvfs, abstractvfs):
> > Did you intentionally leave abstractvfs in the list?
> No, it's a mistake, I'm not sure what the status of this patch is as
> Pulkit said it was queued but I don't see it on the commited repo.
> Should I send a V2?
>

I can see it here:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-committed/rev/6498f0e03526
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20190103/e7e54ce4/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list