[PATCH 7 of 8] discovery: move missing tracking inside the partialdiscovery object

[Boris FELD]

On 04/01/2019 17:05, Pulkit Goyal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 11:18 PM Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net
> <mailto:boris.feld at octobus.net>> wrote:
>
>     # HG changeset patch
>     # User Boris Feld <boris.feld at octobus.net
>     <mailto:boris.feld at octobus.net>>
>     # Date 1545965280 -3600
>     #      Fri Dec 28 03:48:00 2018 +0100
>     # Node ID c5c3e376d7afcb5972f72262d84b6d4b75645329
>     # Parent  b1294a6cb1b4c1d30ef9840bf023b95337603158
>     # EXP-Topic discovery-refactor
>     # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/
>     #              hg pull
>     https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ -r c5c3e376d7af
>     discovery: move missing tracking inside the partialdiscovery object
>
>     This is the final set that we need to track to have a fully up to date
>     information within the object.
>
>     diff --git a/mercurial/setdiscovery.py b/mercurial/setdiscovery.py
>     --- a/mercurial/setdiscovery.py
>     +++ b/mercurial/setdiscovery.py
>     @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ class partialdiscovery(object):
>          - common: exist both locally and remotely
>          - common:    own nodes I know we both know
>          - undecided: own nodes where I don't know if remote knows them
>     +    - missing:   own nodes I know remote lacks
>          """
>
> same, can you replace "I" and "own" with better words, maybe local
Same here, are you okay with a documentation follow up?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20190104/d5d1ca93/attachment.html>