D6428: rust-discovery: using the children cache in add_missing

[kevincox (Kevin Cox)]

kevincox accepted this revision.
kevincox added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> discovery.rs:233
> +    /// sets, for which the discovery process will engage into sampling
> +    /// that needs the children cache anyway.
>      pub fn add_missing_revisions(

These added comments seem more relevant to the implementation of the method than they are to the caller. Would it make sense to move them inside of the function body so that they don't busy the doc-comment?

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6428

To: gracinet, #hg-reviewers, kevincox
Cc: durin42, kevincox, mercurial-devel