Missed 4.9.1 release - should we do it now? (was: Re: Missing march update?)

[Boris FELD]

There is an open issue with subrepository support in 4.9 on Windows:
87a6e3c953e045d92147925fc71aad7c327fdbfd

So I would vote for a 4.9.1 release

On 18/03/2019 14:35, Augie Fackler wrote:
> (mercurial@ to bcc, mercurial-devel@ to cc)
>
>> On Mar 16, 2019, at 22:10, Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote:
>>
>> Mercurial 4.9.1 is late. Any issue?
> Got overlooked because I was on vacation and the other people that can roll releases were similarly absent.
>
> I guess we'll make a judgement call today and tomorrow if we should bother with .1 now, or just hold it to April.
>
> Denizens of -devel, what do you think?
>
>> Thanks for your work!.
>>
>> -- 
>> Jesús Cea Avión                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
>> jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/     _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
>> Twitter: @jcea                        _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
>> jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org  _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
>> "Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
>> "My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
>> "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mercurial mailing list
>> Mercurial at mercurial-scm.org
>> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel