Is anyone using patchwork?
raf at durin42.com
Fri May 17 15:58:19 EDT 2019
> On May 17, 2019, at 3:14 PM, Antonio Muci <a.mux at inwind.it> wrote:
> Just a curiosity:
> I send my few patches via email (patchbomb ext) because somewhere in the doc it was mentioned as being the preferred method.
> What is the best way to contribute nowadays?
The vast majority of patches come in via phabricator. I still read `hg email`ed patches and have plenty of well-oiled scripts to handle them, but it seems most use our bundled phabricator extension. https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ContributingChanges#Sending_patches has a link to the details there.
In general I still slightly prefer the email workflow, but phabricator has its own advantages. Neither is perfect.
> On May 17, 2019 20:48, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-devel <mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org> wrote:
>> A few users still send patches by email. I use patchworks when I queue their patches. If you're okay with queuing patches from these (few) users, I'm okay with shutting down patchworks. Or maybe there's another way to get the patches without installing a mail client?
>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:44 AM Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>>> I got a monitoring email about it yesterday for some transient issue, and discovered that it was still running but it doesn't look like anyone is seriously using it (it's a mess). Is it worth continuing to maintain, or should I consider tearing it down rather than trying to fix my robots that keep it clean?
>>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>>> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
More information about the Mercurial-devel