D7144: status: use unfiltered repo if we're getting status of working copy

[martinvonz (Martin von Zweigbergk)]

martinvonz added a comment.


  In D7144#109543 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7144#109543>, @marmoute wrote:
  
  > I am working on a non-experimental series that get things more contained in repo/changectx to robustness. It also contains tests making sure we do not regress. I think we could so something really robust, efficient and transparent, but having this and that filtered changelog level, with lazyer filtering computation. However I think I dig the rabbit out enough for now. Eventually I think we could get O(1) filtering too removing the need for all this.
  > Sorry for the delay. I need a bit more (actual coding) time to clean this up and submit it.
  
  That's fine. Thanks for the update. I'm glad you had not forgotten about it.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7144/new/

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7144

To: martinvonz, #hg-reviewers, durin42
Cc: mharbison72, pulkit, marmoute, mercurial-devel