Windows RC rebuild needed

Augie Fackler raf at durin42.com
Fri Jan 24 15:09:54 EST 2020


Okay. Is that going to be a problem for 5.3 though? Should I graft that to stable?

> On Jan 24, 2020, at 14:25, Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It looks like D7973 landed on default.  I was able to build successfully with that.
> 
>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 1:02 PM, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Pulkit pointed out on IRC the inno installer/configparser pin issue: is there a patch I should land for that and spin an rc2?
>> 
>>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 11:06, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com <mailto:raf at durin42.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 5.3rc1 is tagged and signed with those patches included. Sorry for the mess.
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 02:01, Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com <mailto:mharbison72 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> There are a couple of issues with rc0 failing on startup because the default config files were moved in this cycle.  The patches that seem to work for me (with MSI) are in Phabricator:
>>>> 
>>>>   https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7980 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7980>
>>>>   https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7981 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7981>
>>>> 
>>>> I still can't build the Inno installer, because it is complaining about configparser needing its version pinned.
>>>> 
>>>> Please spin another RC once those land.
>>>> 
>>>> --Matt
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>>>> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org <mailto:Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org>
>>>> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel <https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel>
>>> 
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20200124/9b2d1082/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list