Windows RC rebuild needed

Gregory Szorc gregory.szorc at gmail.com
Fri Jan 24 22:26:56 EST 2020


I just grafted to stable because the patch should be there for people
wanting to use the in-repo packaging code. I actually produced the rc0
installers from an unpublished changeset including the configparser patch.

There are also issues with the packaging code when encountering rcN version
strings. I'll send another patch or two to stable to make that just work so
that the building and releasing of release candidate releases doesn't
require manual muckery. You should be able to run a one-liner for it all to
"just work."

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:44 PM Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 3:10 PM, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>
> Okay. Is that going to be a problem for 5.3 though? Should I graft that
> to stable?
>
>
> I believe it will be a problem. It fails for me on two different
> machines.  I didn’t check, but I’m guessing that indygreg built rc0 with
> the tag plus that patch.
>
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 14:25, Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like D7973 landed on default.  I was able to build successfully
> with that.
>
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 1:02 PM, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>
> Pulkit pointed out on IRC the inno installer/configparser pin issue: is
> there a patch I should land for that and spin an rc2?
>
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 11:06, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>
> 5.3rc1 is tagged and signed with those patches included. Sorry for the
> mess.
>
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 02:01, Matt Harbison <mharbison72 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There are a couple of issues with rc0 failing on startup because the
> default config files were moved in this cycle.  The patches that seem to
> work for me (with MSI) are in Phabricator:
>
>   https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7980
>   https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7981
>
> I still can't build the Inno installer, because it is complaining about
> configparser needing its version pinned.
>
> Please spin another RC once those land.
>
> --Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20200124/3d2341e4/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list