Windows RC rebuild needed

Matt Harbison mharbison72 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 24 22:59:41 EST 2020


On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:27 PM Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I just grafted to stable because the patch should be there for people
> wanting to use the in-repo packaging code. I actually produced the rc0
> installers from an unpublished changeset including the configparser patch.
>
> There are also issues with the packaging code when encountering rcN
> version strings. I'll send another patch or two to stable to make that just
> work so that the building and releasing of release candidate releases
> doesn't require manual muckery. You should be able to run a one-liner for
> it all to "just work."
>

I'm able to build both locally with this graft, and they look OK at first
glance.  Minor detail things I see (and IDK if these matter much in
practice):

  - The MSI version when you right click > Properties > Details, say 5.3.3
  - The Inno version in the same area is 0.0.0.0
  - The MSI that I just uninstalled claimed to be 5.3.7 (This was built
before rc1 was labeled)
  - The filenames are mercurial-5.3.3-x64.msi vs
Mercurial-5.3rc1+3-624fe53ce1e7+20200124-x64.exe for this build on a dirty
wdir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20200124/17297624/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list