add revision range selection to log

TK Soh teekaysoh at yahoo.com
Sat Aug 6 22:08:11 CDT 2005


--- Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas at intevation.de> wrote:
> * TK Soh <teekaysoh at yahoo.com> [20050806 04:24]:
> > --- TK Soh <teekaysoh at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > --- Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas at intevation.de> wrote:
> > > > * TK Soh <teekaysoh at yahoo.com> [20050716 05:29]:
> > > > >    $ hg log -r1:3 -r8    # select revision 1,2,3 and 8
> > > > 
> > > > This drops the compatibility to 'hg diff' with two -r options. Is
> > > > this still important to anyone? Matt seemed to like this very much,
> > > > as I did, too, but I'm now convinced that it should work like it is
> > > > implemented by TK Soh.
> > > 
> > > I have reverted to --rev in the attached patch.
> > 
> > Any further comment on this patch?
> 
> I have two local trees where I experimented with your patch, but the
> results with 'hg log -rSOMETHING FILE' were strange.

I think I saw the samething, but wasn't sure if I should interprete the output
as 'intended behavior'.
 
> revrange() isn't ready for being used with file revisions yet, so I
> was waiting for the big switch to changeset hashes everywhere to not
> conflict with such efforts.

certainly.



		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 


More information about the Mercurial mailing list