SHA-1 replacement

[Florian Weimer]

* Wojciech Milkowski:

> Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
>
>> I don't think it is very productive to discuss possible SHA-1
>> replacements at this time.  There is no reason to change the hash until
>> an alternative has found widespread acceptance within the crypto
>> community.
>
> Yes, I agree. That was just my (maybe too fast) curiosity, because I 
> found it similar to SHA-1 already used.

It could be *too* similar. 8-(