[RFC] usability of mercurial
jordan.breeding at mac.com
Tue Aug 30 14:07:36 CDT 2005
I have some questions/comments about actually using mercurial on a day to day basis, some of these may have been covered on the list before but I thought I would get all of my current ideas into one place.
- Will there eventually be flags to support mercurial actually doing the copy/unlink operations in the workingdir when doing `hg copy` and/or `hg remove`?
- Will there ever be support for `hg rename` which could either use the new forced support for copy/remove always, or could use them optionally with its own force flag? This way if you want to move file one to file two you could do `hg rename one two` or `hg rename -f one two`.
- Based on the above taking place at some point I think that it would be nive if `hg log -v` could list "Added Files:", "Removed Files:", "Renamed Files:", and "Modified Files:" whenever each type of operation is present in that changeset.
- It would also be nice in my opinion if mercurial had support for directories. It would be nice if the copy/remove/rename support from above also worked on directories. Ideally I would like to be able to do `mkdir one; hg add one;` and have it actually work. I think that if this put in place and the `hg log -v` changes from above are acceptable that `hg log -v` should also list "Added Directories:", "Removed Directories:" and "Renamed Directories:". I don't necessarily think that "Modified Directories:" would be neccessary as modifications to directories would really be add/remove/rename of a file, which would already be listed.
Are any of the above items so controversial that they will never happen? If they are, what is controverial about them?
More information about the Mercurial