[PATCH] a small patch for mq

Kevin Smith yarcs at qualitycode.com
Mon Sep 12 17:01:36 CDT 2005

Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 22:48 +0200, Emanuele Aina wrote:
>>The point is to always use _mq_ on a mq repo, and _hg_ on a hg one.
> How is this supposed to be helpful?  I must be missing something; the
> two repositories are the same.

I understood the request right away, and still think it's a valid 
proposal. It would allow someone to completely replace hq with mq. 
Unless there were some extensions that conflicted with mq, I would have 
no reason to ever use the "plain" hq variant. I would just use mq on all 
my repos.

I'm not convinced it's the best way to go, but from the standpoint of a 
user who just wants to use mq, it's very simple and friendly.


More information about the Mercurial mailing list