mpm at selenic.com
Tue Sep 27 00:26:10 CDT 2005
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:47:07PM -0400, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> >I added these to the wiki a bit ago:
> So, just to confirm: there are no plans in the near future for Mercurial
> to support any kind of "centralized storage", "patch pooling", or other
> mechanisms that would allow lightweight branching without hardlinks?
Well I haven't personally been thinking about it much as I'm focused
on getting the current feature set in a releasable form, and I haven't
seen a proposal for how to do it that's really caught my eye.
Don't tell anyone, but you can actually do "centralized storage"
already (in a CVS-like fashion), with an appropriate set of symlinks.
Doing this a bit more sanely with appropriate locking and so on is
easily achievable with an extension.
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial