Is this the expected revert behaviour ?
Sébastien Pierre
sebastien at xprima.com
Fri May 5 09:11:50 CDT 2006
Le jeudi 04 mai 2006 à 15:26 -0700, Vadim Gelfer a écrit :
> revert modified files or dirs to their states as of some revision
When I read "revert modified files", I understand that only files marked
as M in the 'status' output are reverted. While, as it seems like any
file can be reverted to a particular version. So I don't get why there
is this formulation of "modified files" instead of "the named files".
Moreover, I perceive the notion of "reversion" like something to "go
back in the past", while it is possible to "revert to a newer version",
which sounds weird.
-- Sébastien
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list