bug: qpush loses loses file executable permissions

Giorgos Keramidas keramida at ceid.upatras.gr
Mon Nov 6 04:38:49 CST 2006


On 2006-11-05 17:31, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
>On Thursday 02 November 2006 8:52 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> A third option would be to extend GNU patch(1), making it able to
>> automatically grok and properly handle git-format patches, and submit
>> this to the GNU patch developers.
>
> Or the busybox patch developers, since we have our own (independent)
> codebase and we actually respond to users without insisting you say
> GNU/ or bring us a shrubbery.

I don't know what "busybox patch" is, I'm afraid.  Is it a patch(1)
implementation?



More information about the Mercurial mailing list