bug: qpush loses loses file executable permissions

[Rob Landley]

On Monday 06 November 2006 5:38 am, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-11-05 17:31, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> >On Thursday 02 November 2006 8:52 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >> A third option would be to extend GNU patch(1), making it able to
> >> automatically grok and properly handle git-format patches, and submit
> >> this to the GNU patch developers.
> >
> > Or the busybox patch developers, since we have our own (independent)
> > codebase and we actually respond to users without insisting you say
> > GNU/ or bring us a shrubbery.
> 
> I don't know what "busybox patch" is, I'm afraid.  Is it a patch(1)
> implementation?

Yup.  BusyBox has its own implementation of most commands.  (If it just glued 
together the existing implementations, it wouldn't be smaller.)

Rob
-- 
"Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but
when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery