bug: qpush loses loses file executable permissions

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Tue Nov 7 12:58:37 CST 2006

On Monday 06 November 2006 5:38 am, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-11-05 17:31, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> >On Thursday 02 November 2006 8:52 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >> A third option would be to extend GNU patch(1), making it able to
> >> automatically grok and properly handle git-format patches, and submit
> >> this to the GNU patch developers.
> >
> > Or the busybox patch developers, since we have our own (independent)
> > codebase and we actually respond to users without insisting you say
> > GNU/ or bring us a shrubbery.
> I don't know what "busybox patch" is, I'm afraid.  Is it a patch(1)
> implementation?

Yup.  BusyBox has its own implementation of most commands.  (If it just glued 
together the existing implementations, it wouldn't be smaller.)

"Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but
when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery

More information about the Mercurial mailing list