Branches & hgk

Russell Suter russell at simlogix.com
Fri Nov 10 15:28:31 CST 2006


Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
> * Russell Suter <maverick at simlogix.com> [20061109 20:14]:
>   
>> Russell Suter wrote:
>>     
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I've been playing with branches.  Very nice!  But...
>>> It doesn't appear that hgk works correctly with
>>> branches.  The vertical lines representing the
>>> branches appear but the relationship between
>>> the branches is wrong.  Specifically, the points
>>>       
>> >from which the branch is created.
>>     
>>> Does hgk require an update?
>>>       
>> Here's a sample branchpoint from the log file:
>>
>> changeset:   6:24aff8ebfdcc
>> branch:      bali
>> parent:      -1:000000000000
>> user:        <Username>
>> date:        Thu Nov 09 10:04:10 2006 -0700
>> summary:     <Summary>
>>
>> Is that parent right?  Could that be the problem?
>> I'm using an hourly snapshot from Tuesday morning.
>>     
>
> Uhm, this doesn't look like branches, but like completely unrelated
> changes. That -1:0000 thing is the nullid, which is the only parent
> of the first changeset and of every other completely unrelated
> set of changes.
>
> What you have is not a branch, but a second tree in the same
> repository. But you can merge these tree later if you want.
>   
So, are you saying that this is normal behavior for the "branch"
command?





More information about the Mercurial mailing list