which mercurial version to use??

Lee Cantey lcantey at gmail.com
Sat Apr 28 13:07:29 CDT 2007


On 4/27/07, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 09:22:27AM -0400, Leo Razoumov wrote:
> > Is it save to upgrade from hg-0.9.3 to the tip of "hg" or "hg-stable"
> > repo without running a risk of corrupting my project repos or screwing
> > my ongoing work?
> >
> > In general, how stable is "hg-stable"??
>
> Generally more stable than the last release, as it's restricted to bugfixes.

I've been making releases from the main hg repository.  Is there
interest in changing to or supplementing with the hg-stable
repository?

Thanks,
Lee


More information about the Mercurial mailing list