hg performance

[Simon 'corecode' Schubert]

Dustin Sallings wrote:
>> I'll see if I can reproduce this issue and then bring it up on the  
>> git mailinglist.  If not, I'll come back to you.
> 
> 	OK.  I'm hoping to avoid the ``use a better filesystem'' types of  
> arguments.

Okay, no dice reproducing this here:

27k files, 2.7k dirs, 342MB source tree (DragonFly-HEAD):

sh -c 'hg addremove && hg commit -m "yo"'  61.10s user 9.61s system 63% cpu 1:51.71 total

sh -c 'git add . && git commit -m "hu"'  32.49s user 7.59s system 55% cpu 1:12.03 total


similar results for the emacs source tree (<4000 files).

This is on DragonFly, UFS, softupdates, striping between two PATA/SATA disks.  Files hot cache (fresh tree copy).

Could you please reproduce this with recent versions of hg and git in your environment and possibly with sources publicly available?  (I couldn't find the jdk 1.5 sources)

cheers
  simon

-- 
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \