[ANNOUNCE] new extension: localbranch

[Benoit Boissinot]

On 8/27/07, Alberto Griggio <alberto.griggio at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Not necessarily. You can use named branches and then merge the final
> > version with the "revert  trick" in one changeset and push that
> > particular changeset.
>
> Can somebody elaborate a bit on this? Is it documented somewhere (e.g. in
> the wiki?)
>
hg revert -r <other_head> ; hg commit

but it is not advised if you don't throw away the other head, because
if you continue development, you'll have to remember the hash of the
revert cset and revert from that (otherwise merge will be painful).

regards,

Benoit