[ANNOUNCE] new extension: localbranch

[Alberto Griggio]

> hg revert -r <other_head> ; hg commit
> 
> but it is not advised if you don't throw away the other head, because
> if you continue development, you'll have to remember the hash of the
> revert cset and revert from that (otherwise merge will be painful).

Thanks. So, is this a common usage pattern for "short lived" named branches?
Is there any example somewhere? I'm using "hg clone" for this, I just wanted
to know whether there's a better approach... or is this the whole point of
the localbranch extension?

Alberto