Mercurial Vs. Monotone & Darcs

[Mirza Hadzic]

My feeling is that Mercurial and git are becoming two mainstream 
options, Mercurial for multi-platform and Git for Linux-only projects. 
Linus noted this as well in his google-video git presentation.

Mirza

Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail wrote:
> I'll check this out.
>  
> Boy, never a list had gave me so much homework before. :-)
>  
> thanks guys,
>  
> f(t)
> 
>  
> On 7/8/07, *Marcin Kasperski* <Marcin.Kasperski at softax.com.pl 
> <mailto:Marcin.Kasperski at softax.com.pl>> wrote:
> 
> 
>      > Hello guys, I am trying to learn / pick one version control system to
>      > use in the company that I work for, where they currently use svn.
>     And
>      > for my personal projects as well.
>     Well, it need not always be case. Company and personal needs can differ,
>     for example.
> 
>      >
>      > I saw the conference video on google on mercurial and I pretty much
>      > like it right away. But some guy I respect a bit told me take a look
>      > at monotone and darcs as well.
>     If you mean distributed VC, add also git, bazaar-ng and svk to the list.
>     And maybe sth else ;-)
> 
>     The good news is that the conversion tools are fairly good and
>     improving, so you can try one tool and migrate to the another one later.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial