1.0 approaches

[Adrian Buehlmann]

On 08.02.2008 01:49, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Looks like it's just about time to cut a 1.0 release. I think we've been
> at a reasonable 1.0-level of features and stability for a while now, and
> we probably could have named the 0.9.5 release "1.0" so there's no point
> in putting it off.
> 
> So please take a look at the BTS, ..

I do hope this one could be fixed for 1.0:

http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue910 (hg rename -A on Windows deletes
file if only case changed)

which deletes an uncommitted file.

Also improvements at:

http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue912 (hg update fails on Windows if
case of file changed in repo)

and related:

http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue750 (Revisions with case-only renames
cannot be checkout on case-folding systems)

would be much appreciated.

Unfortunately, I'm not qualified on Mercurial Python coding myself to fix them.
I still have to learn a lot on both fronts first (I'm a Windows C++ developer).