one byte change to file not detected ?

Thomas Arendsen Hein thomas at intevation.de
Wed Feb 27 17:11:26 CST 2008


* Steve Borho <steve at borho.org> [20080227 21:20]:
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 17:27 -0300, Alexis S. L. Carvalho wrote:
> > Something like the patch below (but it would need a better name for
> > ui.limit and I should probably use the mtime of the new dirstate instead
> > of time.time).
> 
> Any reason why this (or something like it) hasn't made it into crew yet?

Nobody suggested a better name for ui.limit :-)

I'd like to have something like this in Mercurial, but there are
things that should be checked to avoid performance loss. One thing
is that during clone the file mtime should be ui.limit seconds in
the past so the dirstate is up to date. But should this happen on a
simple update, too?
Probably not, because then 'make; hg update; make' might go wrong.

Thomas

-- 
thomas at intevation.de - http://intevation.de/~thomas/ - OpenPGP key: 0x5816791A
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrueck - Register: Amtsgericht Osnabrueck, HR B 18998
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner


More information about the Mercurial mailing list