deleting a named branch

[Sean Kelley]

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Michael P. Soulier
<msoulier at digitaltorque.ca> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking of using named branches in Hg to track work on a given activity.
> The branch would be named after a particular bug number, all work done on that
> branch, and then the work would be merged back to default when done.
>
> I'm not sure I want all those branches cluttering up things though, and I'm
> wondering if there's a way to delete the named branches when I'm done with
> them. Is there?

There is a "Local" Branch extension however that is not really meant
to be shared.  Unfortunately it does not
appear to be maintained either.

It is too bad one cannot handle named branches like GIT branches.  It
limits some of the flexibility.

Sean

>
> Thanks,
> Mike
> --
> Michael P. Soulier <msoulier at digitaltorque.ca>
> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
> takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite
> direction." --Albert Einstein
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIS0mQKGqCc1vIvggRAoc0AJ493/byhprsFcVIgl/oMA8F6rvKWQCfbZ0l
> UuXL2G4WRUnAqc9BoiJ9+V4=
> =hOWt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
>
>