deleting a named branch

Martin Geisler mg at daimi.au.dk
Fri Jun 13 03:42:20 CDT 2008


Gilles Moris <gilles.moris at free.fr> writes:

> On Mon June 9 2008 10:19:49 Martin Geisler wrote:
>> The strange thing is that all three points on this list is adressed by
>> the named branches functionality. Except that instead of removing the
>> tag when merged, the branch is marked as inactive in 'hg branches'.
>
> To mark a non merged branch as inactive, the marker concept from
> Adrian is very interesting:
> http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2008-March/005607.html

I see that it generalizes the concept of a named branch to support
several named (markers) per changeset. But does this not only make the
problem worse?



More information about the Mercurial mailing list