Merge on push?

Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.com
Fri Jun 13 22:37:30 CDT 2008


On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:28:32PM -0400, Douglas Philips wrote:
> On 2008 Jun 13, at 6:13 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:36:43PM -0400, Douglas Philips wrote:
> >> I wasn't talking about policy, I was talking about the fundamental
> >> difference in philosophy between CVS and Mercurial (and most other  
> >> DVCs).
> >
> > Ah. Then you're talking past the people you think you're talking to.
> 
> I am trying to make the point that if you want CVS semantics, why not  
> stay with CVS?

If you think I'm wanting CVS semantics, then you aren't actually
reading my emails, nor the emails from the other folks interested on a
merge on push feature. But this has been covered in detail several
times, including in my previous email that you just replied to, so
I'll stop wasting everyone's time by repeating myself again. It does
seem that there are enough folks talking _to_ each other (instead of
_past_) that the issue will be addressed.

-- greg



More information about the Mercurial mailing list