Any former SVK users on this list?

Jim Hague jim at bear-cave.org.uk
Thu Jun 26 13:34:23 CDT 2008


In article <Pine.LNX.4.61.0806261720120.7787 at flmpc21.mch.osram.de>,
Marko Kaening  <mk362 at mch.osram.de> wrote:
>I tested SVK for my purposes in comparison to Mercurial.
>
>I still haven't fully decided what to use in the future, although I 
>initially tended a bit more towards SVK...

I used SVK for a good 18 months before switching to Mercurial.
Wild horses wouldn't drag me back. SVK is a bugger to install if
not pre-packaged, given half a chance combines multiple changes
in one repo into a single change (with concatenated comment)
in another (which I hate), and IME would periodically lose track of changes
already present and bounce a set of changes back and forth between
two repos.

As a plain satellite for disconnected working on a Subversion
repo only, it's OK. Anything more fully distributed and it doesn't cut
it for me. Mercurial has Just Worked in the same setup. It's a joy.
-- 
Jim Hague - jim at bear-cave.org.uk          Never trust a computer you can't lift.



More information about the Mercurial mailing list